Computational Modeling of Direct Steam Generation in Pipes Receiving Concentrated Solar Radiation

  • V. M. Maytorena DGAPA-UNAM
  • J. F. Hinojosa Universidad de Sonora (UNISON), Blvd. Rosales y Luis Encinas, Hermosillo, CP 83000, Sonora, México.

Resumen

The purpose of this work was to simulate the conditions of direct steam generation in a vertical tube receiving concentrated solar
radiation. The modified RPI model was used for the conditions of critical heat flux coupled to a Eulerian two fluid model. The
mathematical model was solved with CFD software ANSYS FLUENT v15. The results were validated with experimental data
reported in the literature and a parametric study was carried out to determinate the effect of the mass flux, the heat flux incident
on the wall and the heat transfer area on: the steam quality, the volumetric fraction and the temperatures of liquid and steam.
From the results obtained, it was determined the required conditions to obtain a steam quality of 100%.

Citas

Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series, Volume 1: Power Sector Issue 2/5, Concentrating Solar Power. IRENA, June (2012).

Hirsch, T., Feldhoff, J.F., Hennecke, K., Pitz-Paal, R., 2014. Advancements in the field of direct steam generation in linear solar concentrators - a review. Heat Transfer Eng. 35, 258–271.

Gonzalez-Roubaud, E., Pérez-Osorio, D., Prieto, C., 2017. Review of commercial thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power plants: steam vs. molten salts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 133–148.

Prieto Cristina, Rodríguez Alfonso, Patiño David, Cabeza Luisa F., 2018, Thermal energy storage evaluation in direct steam generation solar plants, Solar Energy. 159, 501–509.

Aguilar-Gastelum F., Moya S. L., Cazarez-Candiaa O., Valenzuela L., 2014. Theoretical study of direct steam generation in two parallel pipes. Energy Procedia, 2265– 2274.

Xu Rong, Wiesner Theodore F., 2015. Closed-form modeling of direct steam generation in a parabolic trough solar receiver. Energy, 163–176.

Ravelli S., Franchini G., Perdichizzi A., Rinaldi S., Valcarenghi V.E., 2016. Modeling of Direct Steam Generation in Concentrating Solar Power Plants. Energy Procedia, 464–471.

Cundapí Roger, Moya Sara L., Valenzuela Loreto, 2017. Approaches to modelling a solar field for direct generation of industrial steam. Renewable Energy. 666–681.

Lobon, D.H., Baglietto, E., Valenzuela, L., Zarza, E., 2014. Modeling direct steam generation in solar collectors with multiphase CFD. Appl. Energy 113, 1338–1348.

Lobon, D.H., Valenzuela, L., Baglietto, E., 2014. Modeling the dynamics of the multi- phase fluid in the parabolic-trough solar steam generating systems. Energy Convers. Manage. 78, 393–404.

Dinsenmeyer R., Fourmigué, J.F. Caney N., Marty P., 2017. Volume of fluid approach of boiling flows in concentrated solar plants. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 177–191.

Yang, Z., Peng, X.F., Ye, P., 2008. Numerical and experimental investigation of two phase flow during boiling in a coiled tube. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 51, 1003–1016.

Krepper, E., Končar, B., Egorov, Y., 2007. CFD modelling of subcooled boiling-Concept, validation and application to fuel assembly design. Nucl. Eng. Des. 237, 716–731.

Li, H., Vasquez, S.A., Punekar, H., Muralikrishnan, R., 2011. Prediction of boiling and critical heat flux using an eulerian multiphase boiling model. In: ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. pp. 463–476.

Cheung S.C.P., Vahaji S., Yeoh G.H., Tu J.Y., 2014. Modeling subcooled flow boiling in vertical channels at low pressures – Part 1: Assessment of empirical correlations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 736–753.

Zhang, R., Cong, T., Tian, W., Qiu, S., Su, G., 2015. Effects of turbulence models on force convection subcooled boiling in vertical pipe. Ann. Nucl. Energy 80, 293–302.

Braz Filho, F.A., Ribeiro, G.B., Caldeira, A.D., 2016. Prediction of subcooled flow boiling characteristics using two-fluid Eulerian CFD model. Nucl. Eng. Des. 308, 30–37.

Chaitanya R. Mali, V. Vinod, Ashwin W. Patwardhan., 2017. Comparison of phase interaction models for high pressure subcooled boiling flow in long vertical tubes. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 337–359.

Kurul, N., Podowski, M.Z. 1991. On the modeling of multidimensional effects in boiling channels. Proceedings of the 27th National Heat Transfer Conference. pp. 301–314.

Bartolomei, G.G., Chanturiya, V.M., 1967. Experimental study of true void fraction when boiling subcooled water in vertical tubes. Therm. Eng. 14, 123–128.

Ishii, M., Zuber, N., 1979. Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE J. 25, 843–855.

Moraga, F.J., Bonetto, F.J., Lahey, R.T., 1999. Lateral forces on spheres in turbulent uniform shear flow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 25, 1321–1372.

Antal, S.P., Lahey, R.T., Flaherty, J.E., 1991. Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 17, 635–652.

Lopez de Bertodano M., 1991. “Turbulent Bubbly Flow in a Triangular Duct”. Ph.D. Thesis. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.

Del Valle, V.H., Kenning, D.B.R., 1985. Subcooled flow boiling at high heat flux. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 28, 1907–1920.

Mikic, B.B., Rohsenow, W.M., 1969. A new correlation of pool-boiling data including the effect of heating surface characteristics. J. Heat Transfer 91, 245–250.

Cole, R., 1967. Bubble frequencies and departure volumes at subatmospheric pressures. AIChE J. 13, 779–783.

Kocamustafaogullari, G. and Ishii, M., 1983. “Interfacial area and nucleation site density in boiling systems”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 26, 1377-1387.

Lavieville J., Quemerais E., Mimouni S., Boucker M. and Mechitoua N., 2005. "NEPTUNE CFD V1.0 Theory Manual". EDF.

Launder B. E. and Spalding D. B., 1972. Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence. Academic Press, London, England.

Sato, Y., Sadatomi, M., Sekoguchi, K., 1981. Momentum and heat transfer in two-phase bubble flow-I. Theory. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 7, 167–177.

Ranz, W.E., Marshall, W.R., 1952. Evaporation from drops. Chem. Eng. Prog. 48, 141446.

ANSYS Inc. (US), 2013. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide 15317, 565–572.

Publicado
2018-09-22
Sección
Artículos